Skip to header Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to footer

New York City Puts Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Meta Under Oath on AI Risks

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • New York City Puts Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and Meta Under Oath on AI Risks
Cartoon robot witnesses at a hearing table facing gavels and a stylized Lady Justice statue in a courtroom.

Four of the biggest names in AI testified under oath before the New York City Council on October 5, 2026, and one notable invitee did not show up at all.

The Council's Committee of the Whole, which includes all 51 Council members and is reserved for matters of significant citywide importance, convened at City Hall to examine the risks artificial intelligence poses to New Yorkers. According to the Council, the hearing marked the first public testimony under oath on AI risks by the leading companies building the technology.

The companies did not send their chief executives. Council Speaker Menin had earlier said she invited OpenAI CEO Sam Altman and Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei; instead, the witnesses were Logan Graham, head of Anthropic's Frontier Red Team, Morgan Dwyer, OpenAI's head of policy development and operations, Alice Friend, Google's director of AI and emerging tech policy, and Shane Cahill, Meta's director of AI policy and legislation. With a red team lead and three policy directors at the table, several of the toughest questions, particularly around legal liability, were met with the explanation that the topic sat outside the witness's role.

A second panel drew from outside the companies: former Anthropic researcher Jacob Coxon testified in person, while Daniel Kokotajlo, formerly of OpenAI and now head of the AI Futures Project, and Alex Turner, formerly of Google DeepMind, testified remotely. Elon Musk's SpaceXAI was subpoenaed to compel its appearance and did not appear; Menin said the Council would seek court enforcement.

Sitting alongside the hearing was a legislative package: ten AI bills in what is known as the Menin package, including Intro 2602, which proposes penalties of 25,000 dollars per violation. The hearing's agenda, marked final by the Council's legislative information system, listed twelve meeting items led by the oversight item "Examining the Risks Posed by Artificial Intelligence."

The politics of the day were as revealing as the policy. Meta said in a statement reported by local press that it came voluntarily, arguing that earning public confidence requires rigorous safety work and transparency. Other accounts described the companies as appearing under subpoena warnings. Either way, the message from City Hall was unmistakable: the era of AI companies answering questions only on their own terms is ending, and cities are now writing the rules themselves.

AI Implementation
AI Policy
AI Safety
OpenAI
Anthropic
Google DeepMind
Government AI
AI Regulation
Meta

Ai Industry News

Axios: OpenAI and Anthropic Execs War-Game the Day After a Catastrophic AI Event

Cartoon illustration of robot executives around a war-room table rehearsing a crisis plan while a city power-grid panel flashes alerts.

The industry's own insiders say a catastrophic AI incident is coming within six to twelve months. The industry's executives are rehearsing what to say the day after.

  • Read more about Axios: OpenAI and Anthropic Execs War-Game the Day After a Catastrophic AI Event

Google's Gemini Agent: One Universal Workplace Agent, Now in Private Preview

Cartoon illustration of a friendly robot concierge juggling envelopes, documents, spreadsheets, and chat bubbles while directing tiny robot assistants.

Google just made its boldest move in the race to sell AI that does work, not chat: a single universal agent for the workplace, announced at its Gemini at Work 2026 event on October 8.

  • Read more about Google's Gemini Agent: One Universal Workplace Agent, Now in Private Preview

Anthropic and OpenAI Declare Unauthorized Share Transfers Void; Tokenized Shares Crash

Cartoon illustration of a giant rubber stamp slamming down onto paper stock certificates while a stock chart plunges behind.

If you bought a slice of Anthropic or OpenAI on the secondary market, you might want to sit down. The labs just told the market, in unison, that your shares may not exist.

Anthropic and OpenAI both updated their stock-transfer policies this week to declare any share transfer made without board approval "void" — not voidable, void. A void transfer never legally happened. The buyer is not recognized as a shareholder and has no rights. OpenAI's language was nearly identical: transfers without written consent "will not be recognized and carry no economic value to you."

  • Read more about Anthropic and OpenAI Declare Unauthorized Share Transfers Void; Tokenized Shares Crash

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Current page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

Copyright © 2026 Rocky Mountain Madman LLC - All rights reserved

Developed and Designed by Rocky Mountain Madman LLC